Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation
  • mail@loftice.ru
  • +7 (495) 669-70-69
  • RUS
  • SERVICES
    • Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction EvaluationAdministrative services
    • Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction EvaluationPayroll and HR services
    • Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction EvaluationFleet management
    • Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction EvaluationData management
    • Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction EvaluationRenovation and design
  • PROJECTS
  • EVENTS
  • CONTACTS
+7 (495) 669-70-69
  • RUS
02 May 2012
Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation

Loftice conducted a survey focused on administrative managers of Russian and international companies about corporate mobile service. We aimed to collect, systematise, and present information on organisation, control, and ways of optimising corporate mobile service in organisations.

Some of the results can be seen below.

Survey

Format: poll

Survey conducted: April 2012

Number of participants: 23 companies

91% international,
9% Russian.

Sphere of activity

Construction and natural resource
Finance/investment
Pharmaceutics
Production
Consumer goods
Logistics
Retail
Advertisement

Description of participants

Number of personnel in Russia

Representation in Russian regions

Moscow only
Moscow and regions

Mobile providers

The number of providers

one provider for all Russia
local providers for every region, incl. Moscow
one provider for all of Russia exc. 1 or several cities
two providers

Reasons for using local providers

relevant areas not covered: 3 companies
local provider has better quality: 2 companies
local provider offers better prices: 2 companies
historic reasons: used the first provider to arrive in the region, too difficult now to change number pool

What can lead to a change of provider?

More than 1 answer could be selected

bad quality and coverage
high tariffs
displeased with service
compulsory tender

Provider service satisfaction level

Minimum value: 1
Maximum value: 5

quality
coverage
price
client-orientedness
paper work

Conclusions

An average 64% companies use corporate tariffs.
The most common practice is to have:

- one provider for Moscow and regions;
- staff are given limitations in accordance with company policy;
- optional services are mostly within the limitations;
- overspending control enacted; limitations and personnel categories reconsidered periodically.

Respondent would like to have quality and client-orientedness improved.
Respondents find it important to easily access history and have payment grace period.
The point of least satisfaction is red-tape exchange with the provider.
Cost-cutting can be achieved through roaming discounts, package options, content limitations, and personal control over own expenses.


Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation
Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation
Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation
Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation
Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation
Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation Corporate Mobile Service Satisfaction Evaluation
ALL EVENTS

RELATED TOPICS

25 October

Following the 20th round-table meeting

31 August

Launch of short and middle-term car rent with a crew at Loftice

22 May

Practical Administration: following the 19th round-table meeting

16 March

Corporate Car Fleet: following the 18th round-table meeting

20 December

Loftice at OfficeNext event

17 October

Practical Administration: following the 17th round-table meeting

23 March

Practical Administration: following the 16th round-table meeting

20 November

Corporate Car Fleet: following the 15th round-table meeting

09 April

Practical Administration: following the 14th round-table meeting

footer_en

Loftice Application Privacy Policy

© Loftice 2010 - 2025 
Anti-corruption policy

Code of ethics

×